Ethnotaxonomy As Mirrored In Sanskrit Plant Names
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32439/ps.v3i5.56-64Keywords:
Sanskrit Names, Plant Science, EthnotaxonomyAbstract
The intellectual capacity of mankind for classifying natural objects and even abstract concepts is widely recognized. The rich diversity of the environment is described in sufficient details by the nomenclatural and classification systems even within ancient culture. Sanskrit is thought to be a mother of many other languages and a pristine treasure trove. Presently, it is not a language of any nation and hence remained morbid. Sanskrit literature is replete with references to plants and their utilities in ancient past. This rich Indian heritage still waits revealing its glory and secrets. The present author examined some common names of plants in Sanskrit semantically and taxonomically. The bases of coining names, roots of binomial nomenclature and scientific aspects of plant science in Sanskrit are unearthed and compared with modern phytotaxonomic systems. The merits and limits of developments are comparatively discussed highlighting elements of plant science. Studies on this line will also help earmark economic potential and ethnobotanical significance known to ancient Indians. Common plant names in Sanskrit are thus rich store-house of wisdom, knowledge, experiences and past observations of an ambient natural world.
References
Acharya, J. T. (Ed.)(1915). Susruta Samhita (Sanskrit). Nirnya Sagar Press, Bombay, India.
Bentham, G. and J.D. Hoker (1862-1863). Genera Plantarum. Vol.I-III. L.Reeve. & Co., London, UK.
Cronquiest, A. (1988). The Evolution And Classification Of Flowering Plants. 2nd Edn. New York Botanic Garden, New York, USA. ISBN-13:978-08932733323.
Deshpande, A. P., Javalgekar, R. R. and Subhash, Ranade (1988). Dravyagunvidnyan (Part 1-2). Proficient Publishing House, Pune, India.
Engler, A. H. G. and K. Prantl (1887-1915). Die Naturalichen Pflanzanfamilien. W.Englemann, Leipzig, East Germany.
Hutchinson, J. (1973). The Families Of Flowering Plants. 3rd Edn. Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK. ISBN:9780198543770.
Kirtikar, K. R. and B. D. Basu (1981). Indian medicinal plants. Vol.I-IV. International Book Distributors, Dehradun & Periodical Expert Book Agency (II Ed.) Delhi, India. ISBN:10-81713653.
Linnaeus,C.(1745). Flora Svecica Ed.1. Stockholm.
Patil, D.A. and M. V. Patil (2002). Sanskrit plant names in an ethnobotanicl perspective-II. Ethnobotany. 14:87-92.
Patil, D. A. and S. K. Tayade (2014). Sanskrit common plant names in philological and ethnobiological context. The Journal of Biodiversity (Photon) 113:268-271.
Patil, D. A. (2006). Philology vis-à-vis elements of plant nomenclature in Sanskrit. Advances In Biological Sciences. 5:40-51.
Patil, D. A. (2000). Sanskrit plant names in an ethnobotanical perspective. Ethnobotany. 12:60-64.
Sharma, P. V. (2001). Drvyaguna-vijnana Vol.I (Basic Concepts) (Repr.Ed.). Chaukhamba Bharati Academy (Publisher & Distributor) Varanasi, India.
Shastri Haridatta (Ed.).(1940).Charak Samhita (Sanskrit) Vol.1-2. 2nd Edn.Motilal Banarasidas, Lahore, Pakistan.
Singh, R. (1998). Vedic Medicine. Anmol Publications Pvt.Ltd., New Delhi, India.
Sircar, N.N. and Roma Sarkar (Ed.)(1996). Vrksayurveda of Parasara (A Treatise on Plant Science). Indian Medical Science Series No.38. Sri Satguru Publications (A Division of Indian Books Centre), Delhi, India. ISBN:81-7030-441-5.
Sivarajan, V. V. and Indira Balchandran (1994). Ayurvedic Drugs And Their Plant Sources Oxford & IBH Publishing Co.(P.) Ltd., New Delhi, India.
Takhtajan, A.L.(1997). Diversity And Classification of Flowering Plants.Springer, Netherlands. ISBN:978-94-017-7735-3.
Warrier, P.K., Nambiar, V.P.K. and C. Ramankutty(1994-1995). Indian Medicinal Plants. Vol.5 Orient Longman, Calcutta, India. ISBN:8125003010.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 D A Patil
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.